|
This week's topic is:
Photoshop Web Basics: Let's Make a Button, Part
1
There are a few web pros on my mailing list, and
I can already hear them start to snore after
reading that title, but hopefully some of you still
need a bit of orientation on how to make a graphic
for online consumption.
You'd think it would be easy to make a web
button. Wait a minute, I'm going to go make one and
see how long it takes (back later......):
Okay, I'm back.
This button took about 2.5 minutes,
but that includes turning on Photoshop.
Adding text was another 30 seconds or
so
Doing a sew-on button (i.e.- a bit
more interesting) took about three minutes. Of
course, that's after I tried the last one a few
times and blew it. Lining up those little white
holes by hand takes some focus.
The point is, whatever button you are making, if
you know what you are doing, doesn't take long. And
if you are making a DUPLICATE of the first button,
with a text change, it takes even less time.
Again, I say (lest we forget):
IF YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING.
If you don't know, you will be reinventing the
button every time you make one. I know, because for
a long time I did it that way, And it was partially
my fault for being a one trick pony on Photoshop,
and partially the fault of earlier versions of
Photoshop, that weren't as sensitive to the needs
of web designers.
Which is not surprising, since the name of the
program isn't Weboshop.
As a matter of fact (surprise!), Photoshop was
not originally designed to be a web guru's chapati
and ghee, but to serve as an aphrodisiac to
photographers and graphics people who had spent too
much time in the dark(room) mixing arcane chemicals
in the interest of tweaking original photos into
artistic shape.
Hence the inclusion of tools like "dodge" and
"burn" in the Photoshop Tool set, items that make
perfect sense to a darkroom veteran, but to the
rest of us sound like aerobics, football, or some
kind of Vietnam veteran flashback.
Knowing what you are doing in creating web
graphics in Photoshop has 50% to do with
understanding the web and 50% with understanding
Photoshop.
But I'm not going to talk about that (yet). I'm
going to talk about the other 50%, i.e.- print
graphics. This is called backtracking. Side
tracking is something else. Backtracking adds
depth. The other one is a distraction. I'm just
letting you know, so that you know that the next
stuff is important, unlike one of my sidetracks,
which is only included to keep the web veterans
(hear them snoring?) awake.
There is a big to-do about getting web graphics
to be the exact color you want. The loudest voices
in the crowd, of course, have long been the design
crowd.
Color, you see, is no laughing matter to a
designer. If they specify PMS 436, they are not
looking for a particular monthly temper flare up,
but they will have a whole litter of full-size cats
if you do not print their document with the color
they specified (e.g.- PMS 436) when they asked for
it in plain English (or any language).
These guys (and women), take color very
seriously. The don't just say, "give me a blue,"
like a cheerleader would say "give me a B." That's
right, if designers were cheerleaders, they would
say, "Give me a really loud B, with especially deep
bass notes from the wrestlers in the crowd who
aren't playing football, some nice tenors from the
French club guys, with strong alto representation
from the pom pom squad, sopranos from the junior
high kids, with a light tailing off of late shouts
from parents. That's a PMS 436, Pretty Monstrous
Shout #436, thank-you."
(That was a sidetrack, but it was part of a
backtrack, so it may be okay).
The fact is, there has been a long standing
(enormous) print-based industry of color wheels,
swatches, computer monitor calibrators, prepress
samples, veluxes, mockups, all designed to make
sure that when your client has a logo of a
particular color of green , the brochure he gets
off the press has a logo of that same color of
green.
It's not surprising, of course, because not only
artists but even big, well-fed corporate types get
a little attached to the color of their logo. And
for good reason. Coke is used to a certain red
associated with their name. If you saw a coke
bottle with an oddly orang-ish red Coke logo on it,
you might assume that the contents were somehow
un-cokeish, due to spending too much time on a
loading dock somewhere. Not to mention that certain
colors are said to trigger certain emotions in
people, and you might want a consistent emotional
response to your product.
So, everyone gets very alert around colors in
the print arena. Build a better prepress color
verification and proofing system, and you will be
in a strong business position almost every time.
As a matter of fact, getting good consistent
color in a print environment is probably one of the
major skill sets that you expect from your print
designer and your printer. If you find a good print
design guy/gal, and you can't hire them, at least
get their phone number. They are invaluable. You
will need them later, for sure.
So the loud squawks about color problems online
have necessarily been loudest from the print
designers. They are used to having (or desperately
trying to gain) color control.
And then along come some computer dudes who
build the Web and when you ask them about color
consistency, they just say, "Forget it, guy, we
can't control forty million monitors. This is about
universal access, not universal consistency.
Chill."
Worlds in collision. Graphics guys seeking the
perfect color and total visual control. Geeks
celebrating the amazing fact of cross-platform
connectivity and information-sharing of ANY kind.
To the tech guys, the fact that information can
be shared over a distributed network via the HTTP
protocol is a major miracle. And it is. And then
all of a sudden they hear what appears to be a
bunch of whining artists saying "But the color
isn't right!" One shouldn't be surprised if the
techies go "Hello!? You have worldwide distribution
of your documents virtually for free in a digital
environment that doesn't destroy a single tree and
you are worried about light pink versus peachy
pink?"
Still, for those who care about color online
(and they will always be there), technologies
emerge, programs evolve, and industries are
developed. In other words, if someone is paying,
even the geeks will get will get excited about
accurate color.
Adobe may have thought at one time that they had
the perfect solution in Adobe Acrobat. There's a
web plug-in (and a stand-alone program) that allows
you to view print documents in a digital
environment in mint condition, just as the designer
intended. Oh, the colors may still vary, based on
your monitor settings, but you will basically see
that way cool brochure design just as it was
intended). And now with the possibility of adding
hyperlinks to Acrobat files, such files could, in
theory, replace regular web pages.
But that's not going to happen. The web page
phenomenon is too entrenched, and the Acrobat stuff
still seems clunkier and slower than the web (which
is itself still known as the World Wide Wait in
some circles). In some ways, Acrobat can be seen as
a tool for showing off your design, or for putting
something online when you are too lazy to repurpose
it for the web.
So we are back to looking for good color online.
The challenge here is that there are many web
browsers. And, of course, the varying browsers have
varying standards for what colors they display
well. And, at the same time there's the Mac versus
PC problem, and the varying monitors and monitor
settings out there.
Most people designing web pages have at least
heard of web safe colors, which are the subset of
the colors that look good on the Netscape browsers
that also look good on the Internet Explorer
browsers.
This brings us back to Photoshop, where when you
are creating a button, you want to pick from the
array of safe colors, known in Photoshop as the web
safe palette. What you have to do is acquire a
particular file that contains those web safe colors
and pick from that group when you design your
button.
You may not get exactly the color of green that
you wanted, but you will get something that
probably won't have little white dots all over it,
which is the likely result if you pick an "unsafe"
color.
The latest versions of Photoshop come with these
web safe palettes. All you have to do is a bit of
drilling down through menus to find them. On
Photoshop 5.5, you open up a new document of any
size, then burrow down this path of item selections
off the menus: window>show swatches>load
swatches>goodies>color swatches and chose one
of the web safe palettes, like webhues.aco or
webspectrum.aco. I like the second one because,
even though it gives some duplicate colors, they
are easier to see and pick out. It looks like
this:
(you will note that sometimes even some of these
colors pixellate on your browser. the grim news is
that the true web safe palette is even slenderer
than this. One of my OUTBOX margin links
from a
few weeks back mentioned this)
Once you have selected one of those, when you go
back into your document, and use the
eye-dropper/color-picker tool to select the color you want and you
can use it to fill in your document. You will see
the color that you have selected in the left of the
two color boxes on the tool bar. You can then use the paint bucket tool
to pour the color into your document,
or click on the curved arrow that connects the two
sample colors on the tool bar, which will switch
your new color to the right box. Once you do that, you can erase all
the color in the box with the eraser (or if you know how to use the marquee
tool in the upper left box of the tool bar, drag over the entire area and delete).
Well, that was visual.
The thing is, unless you start with a good
color, you might as well go home.
In the old days (I seem to talk a lot about
them, although, on the web, the old days are only
five or six years old - just out of the toddler
stage), in order to make a button, you had to open
Photoshop, open a new document, make the button,
drill down through the image>mode path, and
change the RGB document to indexed color.
The default setting was RGB (red, green, blue),
which is best for dealing with photos (we're in
Photoshop, remember). But broad bands of color tend
to pixellate (like white measles, mentioned above)
in RGB in web environments, so you had to make the
change to indexed color.
Indexed color change required you to answer a
number of questions, like
- Flatten layers?
- Palette? (you chose adaptive)
- Number of colors (you chose as few as
possible, probably 32 or 64)
Then you had to save the file. But you couldn't
save it in the format you wanted (the .gif format),
because that format wouldn't show up unless you
saved it as a copy of the document.
So, you can see, you used to have to create the
button in RGB, save it in .gif format, but there
were what seemed to be at least twenty steps to
creating every darn button.
That was it, and it took forever.
But now Photoshop is smarter, more web savvy,
and so are you.
Now all you have to do is create your button and
hit the magic button (under menu) "save for web."
When you do that, you get a menu that allows you
to save the file in any format you specify, gif or
jpeg,. You can choose form four different versions
that are nicely displayed, including an estimate of
their download speed, and you are off to the races.
Of course, all that doesn't really happen in
Photoshop, it happens in Adobe Imageready, which
might as well be Photoshop, because it comes
bundled with Photoshop, and it automatically opens
like an obedient puppy whenever you ask.
That does save you time, and is extremely
gratifying to the old time web designer like
myself.
But of course, now that I know Photoshop better,
I realize that is was doing it the hard way even
back then, since I didn't know how to use layers.
More on that next week, in the continuing saga of
"How to Make a Web Button." That's when we'll
really learn how to do it. Try to hang on until
then. You can use the time to write the text for
the buttons, e.g.-
- Back
- Home
- About Us
- History
- F.A.Q.
- More Info
- Previous Page
- Next Page
Don't strain.
See you then.
-Paul
Comments?
|